Independent Scrutiny Section 16G(3) of the Children and Social Work Act 2017 requires safeguarding arrangements to include independent scrutiny of their effectiveness. To support this, the North West Hub provide capacity through the North West Independent Scrutineer role.
This role is designed to collaborate with local Independent Scrutineers, helping to coordinate scrutiny and support evaluation of safeguarding effectiveness across sub-regional and regional levels. This role does not replace local scrutiny arrangements, but aims to enhance their impact by:
• Strengthening collaboration across the region Developed in collaboration with Research in Practice Supporting evidence-informed practice with children and families, young people and adults | Research in Practice
• Providing additional independent scrutiny capacity and expertise in sub-regional spaces
• Provide support and respectful challenge to regional and sub regional Delegated Safeguarding Partners (DSPs) and Lead Safeguarding Partners (LSPs) in responding to regional safeguarding priorities and learning.
The North West Independent Scrutineer will maintain strong links with local scrutineers to ensure alignment, shared learning, and a coherent approach to improving outcomes for children. As well as the need for scrutiny, WT23 sets out the function to report on the impact of scrutiny activity itself and yearly reports should include a review of the impact and learning from independent scrutiny arrangements. The NW Independent Scrutineer role can support this.
Working Together (2023) (Page 37) identifies 7 key Functions of independent scrutiny role.
• Provide safeguarding partners and relevant agencies with independent, rigorous, and effective support and challenge at both a strategic and operational level (steps 1 to 6 inclusive).
• Provide assurance to the whole system in judging the effectiveness of the multi-agency safeguarding arrangements through a range of scrutiny methods (steps 1 to 6 inclusive: see also the ‘what to scrutinise’ and how to scrutinise’ in The checklist for Independent scrutiny (www.theasp.org.uk).
• Ensure that statutory duties are being fulfilled, quality assurance mechanisms are in place, and that local child safeguarding practice reviews and national reviews are analysed, with key learning areas identified and effectively implemented across the safeguarding system (step 4 and 5).
• Ensure that the voice of children and families is considered as part of scrutiny and that this is at the heart of arrangements through direct feedback, informing policy and practice (step 3).
• Be regarded as a ‘critical friend’ and provide opportunities for two-way discussion and reflection between frontline practitioners and leaders. This will encourage and enable strong, clear, strategic leadership (steps 1 to 6 inclusive).
• Provide independent advice when there are disagreements between agencies and safeguarding partners and facilitate escalation procedures (Main focus steps 1 and 2).
• Evaluate and contribute to multi-agency safeguarding published arrangements and the annual report, alongside feeding into the wider accountability systems such as inspections (step 1)